6 Sep 2023 2:24 pm
The criminal activity, clearly, isn't that open and brazen, if you have to spend 3 years plus relentlessly investigating a person, and all you come up with at the end of that waste of time and money, is some of these dog-****, nonsense indictments to try and hang them with. By the way, you shouldn't be investigating people at all. Crimes are investigated until those responsible are found. People shouldn't be investigated until you can find a crime to hang them with.Pastafarian » 06 Sep 2023, 2:06 pm » wrote: ↑ No, clown car, acting criminally in the open is a sign that his past crimes of which the GOP refused to acknowledge has only made Trump more brazen in his crimes.
The GOP enabled Trump to be more brazen in his criminality.
Acting openly criminal isn’t something honorable, you cultist swine.
The contortions and convoluted fabrications of the law that have been indulged in, in all the indictments, are not indications of brazen lawbreaking on the part of Trump. It's an indication you have no clear-cut criminal activity in the first place.
The indictments are indicative of the same fixated 'get-Trump' nonsense I was talking about earlier. They'd be laughable were it not for the fact the E. Jean Carroll case found Trump liable with no actual evidence presented
No, I'm not raking through history to 'provide links'. If you can't directly dispute a point, then question your own links.